Friday, October 18, 2019

Of Impeachment and Bipartisanship


Of course, the impeachment process would be best with bipartisan support. Perhaps Republican critics could show us how. As the President and his supporters in Congress sing loudly for sweet harmony, the line of partisanship is drawn in the sand. The founders required bipartisan support for the impeachment process? Really? Where in the constitution or the writings of the founders is that found? 

Because Republicans insist on bipartisan impeachment proceedings,  they posit that Mr. Trump is entitled to ignore the proceedings. Pointing out the obvious here, but Mr. Trump is not allowed to write his own rules instead of letting the Congress exercise oversight privileges. 

Why not vote on the matter now? In previous impeachment proceedings, there has always been a special prosecutor gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, following leads to present to the full House of Representatives for a full vote. In this case, the Justice Department has declined to investigate or assign a special prosecutor. The House is currently filling that gap with what is, in essence, a Grand Jury investigation. The investigation is underway. The evidence is being gathered in closed hearings to ensure witnesses speak truthfully before the case is presented to the full House. 

Yes, Pelosi could win a vote, but it would be premature to present an incomplete case to Congress. The most significant point, however, is that Congress, as a co-equal branch of government, gets to set its own rules and conduct oversight as appropriate. This power is indeed bipartisan if one simply checks the history of Congressional oversight in the past ten years. 

I’m confident that few or no Republicans would vote in favor of the impeachment inquiry. That’s to be expected from a partisan political party. Of course, they wouldn’t support it. I wouldn’t either unless a convincing case could be made following a complete investigation. Let House finish gathering the evidence and then present it to the full House for a vote. Then we would see if there is bipartisan support. 

I strongly disagree that investigations into misbehavior by the executive branch are “fishing expeditions.” Congress has the power of oversight now and has had it since Congress began. Investigations are not “fishing expeditions” but constitutionally mandated oversight, no matter who the majority party happens to be. 

I’m pretty sure Republicans can do bipartisanship if they so desired. I would love to be wrong, but I expect that Mr. Trump’s enablers will support him right up to and maybe past the moment when he “murders someone on 5th Avenue.” I’d really love to be wrong. 

No comments: